“You should totally call in sick tomorrow so we can go shred some fresh…” You know you have been convinced, on at least one occasion, to blow off work and go ski or ride. You probably have even been the one doing the convincing, I know I have. This on-going conversation between friends during ski season gave Line Skis the great idea to come out with a 3 ski lineup, all with the title of “Sick Day”. The Sick Day comes in three different waist widths; 95mm, 110mm and 125mm. A few weeks ago, Blake wrote a great review on the Sick Day 125 and how it destroys big mountain powder lines. With spring skiing conditions on everyone’s mind, today we are going to focus on the Sick Day 95. To me, this is the ideal do-everything ski for most days, but makes for an amazing spring ski.
A 95mm waist, with rocker in the tip and tail, make this ski a beast for conquering the entire mountain. Spring skiing is different for everyone. I like to start off the day looking for anything that may still be soft in the trees, then transition to groomers, then finish up the day on some “slushy” bumps. The Sick Day 95 is literally perfect for all of these disciplines. The tip and tail rocker make the ski incredibly maneuverable in tight spaces like bumps and trees. I like to be in the trees most of the time, but the wider skis can be tough to maneuver when the snow is not fresh, crunchy and maybe even icy. The Sick Day 95 is a great ski to take in trees when there has not been an abundance of fresh snow. I was possibly most impressed with the groomed run performance of the Sick Day 95. Usually when you have a ski with tip rocker, tail rocker, and no metal, there can inevitably be some chatter and loss of stability. Not on this ski. I swear, I skied these things just as fast as I ever have and noticed zero chatter and absolutely no loss of stability. When you tip the ski up on edge, the rockered portions in the tip and tail engage and make for a nice smooth carve.
Another obviously fantastic thing about these skis, is how light they are. The Sick Day 95 is no softy though, do not be fooled. The relatively stiff wood core gets you snappy responsiveness on the frontside. Without the added weight of metal, this would make for an awesome everyday touring ski. The lightweight core and the rocker make this a super fun ski to throw around in the slush also. Weather it is your first powder ski, touring machine or just your all around everyday ripper; the Sick Day 95 can handle anything you throw at it.
Is there any difference between the 2014 and 2015 skis? I know the graphics are different but wasn’t sure if they changed anything.
Hi Alexander,
There is no difference whatsoever in the materials and construction between these two years. The only difference would be the graphics! Please let us know if you need anything else!
Have a great day!
Zack
I am 5’10” and 155lbs, age 55, longtime expert skier. Would you recommend the 179 size or the 172? Thanks for your thoughts. Leaning toward 179.
Hi Daniel,
You could could ride either size but since you’re an expert, I’d recommend the 179cm.
-Katie
Hi there,
will this skis be good on piste all day long? I ski off piste of course but sometimes i only ski on piste whole day with my friends. Which size do i need? I am 5’8″ and 195 lbs, advanced skier. Would be 179 good for me?
Hi Martin,
I’d recommend the 172cm for you. It’d be a better size for an all mountain ski.
-Katie
Hello- I was hoping you could help me out with a sizing question. I’m 5’11, 182 lbs. expert east coast skier with the occasional trips out west. I prefer to ski off piste but ski what I can here in the east. Bumps trees and groomers etc. I’m torn between the 186 and 179s. Is there enough tip rocker on these to warrant a 186 for someone with my specifics? I was leaning towards the 179s.
Thanks for your help!
John
Hi John,
I am very similar measurements to you, maybe a bit heavier, and I would certainly choose the 179. This is especially true for bumps and tree skiing which it sounds like you like to do. The 179 will have plenty of edge hold at high speeds when you need it to and maximum versatility in those tight spaces. Let us know if you have any questions, thanks!
Zack
Hi – I was wondering if the shorty version of these skis were the same as the adult version. I’m only 5’3″/161 cm and 67 kg and ski very much as you described in your review. I was considering the 162 cm shorty version of this ski – the fact it’s almost half the price is quite tempting as well.
Cheers
Alister
Thanks Zack! Exactly what I needed to hear!
Hi Alister,
The Sick Day Shorty is a bit different than the adult version. It has a cap construction and is a lot softer flex than the adult version. It won’t perform like the review since it’s a junior ski.
-Katie
Hi…
Torn between the 95 and 110. Ski in the West and looking for a daily driver – one ski quiver.
Strong intermediate skier 6′ – 210lbs.
Which do you suggest?
Thanks.
Dan
Hi Dan,
For a one ski quiver, you will be better served on the Sick Day 95. It is incredibly nimble on hard-pack and in bumps, where the 110mm Sick Day certainly lacks. The 95mm still has plenty of flotation and much more versatility, so that is the choice if you ask me!
Thanks,
Zack
hello, I’m 5′ 10″ and weigh about 167 pounds. I am a strong intermediate skier who loves off piste and an occasional groomer. I was wondering with the sick day 95 do you recommend 172 or 179 length?
Thank you,
Simon
I’ll be 65 in June, I’m 6’1″, 160, advanced skier in northeast. Recently was able to purchase 2014 Sick Day 95 186 as 179’s weren’t available. Current skis are 2012 K2 Rictors, 174’s. I absolutely LOVE the Sick Days! So light and maneuverable, great grip and don’t beat you up! Love my K2’s, but the Sick Days are, as they say, “more funnier!”
Hi Simon, I’d recommend the 172cm size. It will be great even as you advance. -Katie
I’m 5’8″ 150lbs advance skier. I prefer hard packed steep groomers to “powder”(> 12”) days. I noticed the 172 seem to run short for a 172. Should I still get the 172 or venture up to the 179??
Thanks
Hi Larry, The 172cm “run short” because of the rocker tip and tail. The skis have a good amount of rocker to them so if you like skiing fast, the 179cm will feel more stable–especially on the hard pack days. I’d only recommend going up to the 179cm if you consider yourself an advanced to expert level skier. -Katie
hi..trying to get info from line is going fishing and getting nothing.mostly interested in the sick day 95 or the as versatile groomer, touring and small pow ski. i am 200 and aggressive and usually go to board when it gets deep. I tried to find what type of cloth is used and how many layers.
People have also said that quality control is poor resulting in some top sheet and other defects.
what say you?
Hi Rob, I think the Sick Day 95 is a versatile all mountain ski- I wouldn’t only peg it as a groomer ski. It doesn’t have any metal, so as a bigger guy, you might have better luck with the Supernatural series. I couldn’t tell you exactly the layup of this ski (how many layers of fiberglass etc.) because I think its proprietary information that manufacturers don’t even tell us, the retailers. Our shop hasn’t had any warranty issues with the Sick Day skis since they debuted two summers ago. -Katie
Hi
I am 5’11” and weigh 170#. I am an advanced intermediate skier (blues and blacks). I ski mostly on groomed trails,in Colorado, but also enjoy a few tree runs and a few mogul runs each day (intermediate at these, but love skiing them) and love to ski powder when it is available. I am interested in the Sick Day 95, as they seem to be VERY versatile. Would you suggest the 172cm or the 179cm ski for me.
Thank you!
Hi Jeff, the Sick Day 95 is a great choice for an all-mountain ski for Colorado. For someone with your experience and height and weight, you could go either way with the 172 or the 179. The 172 will be slightly better in bumps and trees, and will be slightly more nimble overall, whereas the 179 will be slightly better at higher speeds and in deeper snow. I think if you go with the 179 you will have more ski to grow with as you advance your skills, and that the 172 will prove easier to use straight out of the box. Let us know if you have any other questions!
– Dan
Hi – I’m 37, 6′ 230 lb and I live in the East. Will be doing a lot of skiing in VT and 2 trips out west. I am a recovering mogul and glades addict and I am looking for a ski that I can fly around the groomers with my kid then bounce over to the bumps and off-piste when I can shake loose. I’m liking what I’m hearing about the 95. I was thinking 179 for bumps and trees. Thoughts?
Hi Dave,
I think you’re spot on for length with the 179cm Sick Day 95 for the best bumps and trees performance for your height and weight. 186cm would be great for the groomers, but not as quick in those tighter trees and bumps you like.
Thanks for your question!
Dan
i’m about 6’1” and 145, i mostly ski groomers, some trees. i would really like a ski i can do all of that with, plus be comfortable in powder with. i’ve always had trouble with ski size because of my length/weight. what size do you think would fit me best? i ski 167cm right now and enjoy the agility, but they lack in speed and flotation in powder (they are not as wide as the sick days either though).
Hi Matt,
Thanks for writing in! One thing to remember is that a ski can’t really tell how tall you are, but it can certainly feel your weight. That said, stick more to your weight for sizing recommendations. I’d say something in the 167cm – 176cm range would likely suit you very well (so, for Sick Days, the 172cm length). When you are looking for a powder ski, sizing up can get you the float you aren’t currently getting, but it will cut down a bit on your agility. A couple of other considerations are the skis’ rocker profile and whether they have a full sidewall or not. I recommend giving the shop a call at 303.237.7547 so we can talk over some options for you.
Dan